Thursday, December 26, 2013

The Sacramentarian Controversy

The Sacramentarian Contr of all timeyplacesy The doctrine of the legitimate presence of deliverer in the work had been established in the Romish church since the fourth Lateran Council in the year 1215. For three hundred years the mass and transformation had been the principal bulwarks of Rome, and her greatest blasphemy. The report of the corporeal presence of rescuer in the holy supper threw a halo of sacred immensity around it, excited the imagination of the people and fixed it latterly in their affections. It was the origin of many ceremonies and superstitions, of great wealth and article of faith to the priesthood, and the most stupendous miracles were said to be wrought by the consecrated bread, both among the living and the dead. It thus became the corner careen of the papal edifice. Luther, as a priest and a monk, intemperately believed in this mystery of iniquity, and never was, throughout his whole career, delivered from its delusion. He sinned again st God and his own conscience when he accepted hieratic script ordination, and from that period a judicial blindness seems to have be on his mind as to the power of the priest over the elements.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Transubstantiation, or the actual conversion of the bread and vino-colored into the real carcass and blood of Christ, by priestly consecration, was then, as it alleviate is, the prize doctrine of the church of Rome. Those who doubt this are denounced as infidels. As a reformer, Luther gave up the term transubstantiation and adopted, if possible, the quiet deal more inexplicable term of consubstantiation. He renounce d the papal approximation that the bread an! d fuddle after consecration remained no longer, but were changed into the cloth body and blood of Christ. His strange notion was, that the bread and the wine-coloured remained just what they were before real bread and real wine but that there was also to chafeher with the bread and wine, the hooey aggregate of Christs human body. No invention of man, we may freely affirm, ever equalled this popish doctrine in absurdity,...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.